Until quite recently, my 200 or so fine art images were not separated by categories. I’ll deal with each of the above categories separately.īy the way, here’s a link to my FAA portfolio.
The key takeaway from the above is that most buyers care as much as who the buyer is as the content of the print, so need to spend time promoting YOURSELF as an artist/brand.
– Care to know about the artist they are supporting” – Might come to FAA once in their lifetime – Are buying something for the living room or office – Are making the occasional purchase for themselves or as a gift – Are spending their own hard earned cash – Could care less about the image supplier – designers are buying for their business using the company’s money – microstock companies have a customer base that frequently licenses from them – many pay a subscription – microstock sells to professional image buyers who need lots of low cost images every day A Recap on how Print on Demand differs to MicrostockĮdward Fielding in the FAA forum wrote the following, which I found describes the differences brilliantly:
In fact, I have no issues with creating a thread within the forum and in a friendly way requesting advice – most people are more than willing to help. So, I’ve decided to take an active approach and I’ve been discussing with veterans on their friendly forum on how to get my collection up to speed. I haven’t had any sales on FAA, which is frustrating. In late June, I wrote about FAA – that post is available here as part of my series on Opportunities Outside of Microstock. This past week, I’ve turned my full attention to optimising my Fine Art America (FAA) portfolio to achieve sales.
0 kommentar(er)
